I can help you conduct literature review in business
- 4.3
- (5)
Project Details
Why Hire Me?
I bring extensive experience in business research, academic writing, and critical analysis to support your literature review needs. With 7+ years as a data analyst and research consultant, I ensure your review is rigorous, relevant, and aligned with academic expectations.
Key Strengths:
-
Strong command of business disciplines: marketing, finance, strategy, HR, and entrepreneurship
-
Proficiency in academic databases like JSTOR, ScienceDirect, and Emerald
-
Expertise in conducting systematic, narrative, and thematic reviews
-
Skilled at identifying gaps in existing research and aligning literature with your research questions
-
Adherence to APA, Harvard, or any required citation style
-
High-quality academic writing with emphasis on clarity, structure, and coherence
-
Capability to support students, researchers, and professionals across academic levels
I focus on providing a literature review that not only summarizes sources but also critically evaluates and connects them meaningfully to your research objectives.
What I Need to Start Your Work
To begin crafting a focused and academically rigorous literature review, I need the following details:
1. Research Topic and Objectives
-
A clear definition of your research topic in the business field
-
Specific objectives or questions you intend to address
-
Key themes or concepts central to your study
2. Scope and Depth of Review
-
Intended breadth (broad overview or focused study)
-
Specific areas (e.g., digital marketing, sustainable finance)
-
Theories or models to be included (e.g., Porter’s Five Forces, TAM, RBV)
3. Source Preferences
-
Preferred source types (peer-reviewed journals, white papers, books)
-
Must-include authors or journals
-
Publication year restrictions (e.g., post-2018)
4. Methodology and Framework
-
Preferred review type: systematic, scoping, narrative, or thematic
-
Any desired structure: chronological, conceptual, theoretical
5. Existing Work or References
-
Any prior review or articles you've shortlisted
-
Your current notes or summaries (if available)
6. Formatting and Output
-
Required citation style (APA, Harvard, MLA, etc.)
-
Expected length (word count range)
-
Document structure requirements (headings, subsections, etc.)
7. Timeline and Communication
-
Final submission deadline
-
Milestone dates (e.g., first draft, review round)
-
Preferred contact mode and feedback method (e.g., email, Google Docs, MS Word track changes)
8. Additional Considerations
-
Emphasis on particular debates, regions, or industry-specific literature
-
Software or tools (e.g., Mendeley, Zotero) if you require a bibliography file
-
Accessibility constraints (e.g., university-provided databases only)
Portfolio

A Literature Review on Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation in Remote Work Environments
This literature review explores how transformational and transactional leadership influence employee motivation and productivity in remote workplaces. It synthesizes recent studies from US and UK organizational research.

Understanding Brand Loyalty in the Age of Subscription Economy: A Thematic Review
This review examines how customer engagement, perceived value, and habit formation contribute to brand loyalty in subscription-based businesses, drawing from recent literature in marketing journals across North America and Europe.

Corporate Sustainability Integration in Strategic Management: A Systematic Literature Review
This dissertation synthesizes literature on how corporations embed environmental and social goals within strategic decision-making. It covers frameworks, implementation challenges, and measurement practices in US and UK firms.
Process

Customer Reviews
5 reviews for this Gig ★★★★☆ 4.3
very well organised review and included everything I asked for even incorporated my feedback in the second draft without any issue
i needed a quick review for my proposal and he pulled it off in 3 days with proper citations and all well worth the price
he gave a lot of sources but I think 2 or 3 were slightly old maybe could use more recent ones still overall solid work
i liked how the literature review was structured around themes not just dumped chronologically made my life so much easier
she covered almost all the authors I had in mind and even found some newer studies I missed good flow but had to rephrase few sentences for my style